Kubernetes has become the de facto standard for container orchestration, and as organizations increasingly adopt it, the need for secure, scalable, and flexible ingress controllers becomes paramount. An ingress controller is a critical component that manages external access to services within a Kubernetes cluster, typically HTTP or HTTPS traffic. Selecting the right ingress controller for Kubernetes is crucial for ensuring seamless and secure communication. In this article, we'll explore some of the best ingress controllers for Kubernetes that offer robust security features.
K8s Ingress Controller Comparison: Key Takeaway
Here is the summary of the seven ingress controllers that we have tested for this article.
Ingress Controller | Key Features | Best Use Case | Pricing |
Pomerium | Identity-aware access, zero trust model, centralized access control, secure by default.
Advanced Layer 7 security. | Organizations prioritizing security, zero trust, and identity-based access | Open-source (Paid version available).
Pomerium Zero: Free for personal use, $7/mo/user for enterprises. |
NGINX Ingress Controller | Mature, reliable, SSL termination, flexible routing, Lua script extensibility | Stable, well-documented, community-supported environments | Open-source |
Traefik | Auto-discovery, real-time updates, SSL management, easy-to-use dashboard | Dynamic environments needing easy-to-use, auto-discovering controllers | Open-source (Paid version available with Traefik Enterprise) |
HAProxy Ingress | High-performance, Layer 7 routing, advanced configuration, robust observability | High-performance environments requiring extensive traffic management | Open-source |
Envoy | Advanced Layer 7 features, extensibility, distributed tracing, custom filters | Teams needing feature-rich, cloud-native ingress with complex traffic scenarios | Open-source (Paid version available with managed services) |
Istio Ingress Gateway | Advanced traffic management, mTLS security, intelligent routing, service mesh integration | Organizations using Istio for service mesh, requiring seamless integration | Open-source (Part of Istio service mesh, which is also open-source) |
Contour | High performance, HTTP/2, and gRPC support, path-based routing, lightweight | Lightweight, high-performance ingress for modern protocols like HTTP/2 and gRPC | Open-source |
Top Ingress Controllers for Kubernetes: Choose the Best
Here is a detailed comparison of our seven best Ingress Controllers for Kubernetes to help you understand which one will work best for your organization.
1. Pomerium
Pomerium is one of the widely popular ingress controllers for Kubernetes. It’s also an identity-aware proxy that enables secure access to applications based on user identity. This makes Pomerium an excellent choice for organizations that prioritize security and need to enforce context access controls.
Key Features:
Identity-Aware Access: Pomerium integrates with identity providers (e.g., Google, Azure, Okta) to enforce access policies based on user identity. This is particularly beneficial for organizations that need to ensure that only authorized users can access certain services.
Zero Trust Security Model: Pomerium is built around the zero trust security model, meaning that it doesn’t inherently trust any network, whether inside or outside the perimeter. Access is always authenticated and authorized, reducing the risk of unauthorized access.
Centralized Access Control: With Pomerium, access policies are centrally managed, making it easier to enforce consistent security across your entire Kubernetes environment.
Secure by Default: Pomerium provides built-in support for SSL and mTLS, ensuring that all traffic is encrypted by default. This reduces the risk of man-in-the-middle attacks and ensures data confidentiality.
Flexible Deployment Options: Pomerium can be deployed as an ingress controller or as a standalone proxy, giving organizations flexibility in how they secure their applications.
Layer 7: Pomerium provides Layer 7 security, focusing on user identity and application-level context rather than just network traffic (Layer 4).
Use Case: Pomerium is particularly well-suited for organizations that require robust security features, such as those operating in regulated industries (e.g., healthcare, finance) or those with a strong focus on zero-trust security principles.
Minus Points:
Requires integration with an identity provider, which can add complexity. If the user does not have their own identity provider, Pomerium provides a “Hosted Authenticate Service”.
Less community support (for open source) compare to more established options. They provide email support only for the Zero version and dedicated support for the Enterprise version.
2. NGINX Ingress Controller
NGINX Ingress Controller is one of the most popular choices for Kubernetes. It's widely adopted due to its maturity, reliability, and extensive feature set. NGINX offers advanced load balancing, SSL termination, and flexible routing, making it a solid choice for many Kubernetes environments.
Key Features:
Supports a wide range of annotations for fine-grained control.
Offers SSL/TLS termination with optional Let's Encrypt integration.
Can be extended with custom Lua scripts for advanced use cases.
Use Case: NGINX is well-suited for environments that require a stable and well-documented ingress controller with extensive community support.
Minus Points:
3. Traefik
Traefik is a dynamic, cloud-native ingress controller designed to handle microservices architectures. It automatically discovers services, configures itself, and provides real-time updates, making it an excellent choice for dynamic environments.
Key Features:
Auto-discovery of services and configurations.
Native support for Let's Encrypt for automatic SSL certificate generation.
Integrated dashboard for real-time monitoring.
Use Case: Traefik is ideal for teams looking for a modern, easy-to-use ingress controller with dynamic service discovery and SSL management.
Minus Points:
4. HAProxy Ingress
HAProxy Ingress is known for its performance and reliability. HAProxy has a long-standing reputation as a high-performance load balancer, and its ingress controller is no exception. It offers advanced traffic management capabilities, including routing based on Layer 7 (HTTP) information.
Key Features:
High-performance load balancing with extensive configuration options.
Advanced Layer 7 routing with support for HTTP headers, cookies, and more.
Robust monitoring and observability with integrated logging and metrics.
Use Case: HAProxy Ingress is ideal for environments that require high-performance traffic management and need to handle a large volume of requests efficiently.
Minus Points:
5. Envoy
Envoy is an open-source edge and service proxy designed for cloud-native applications. It’s highly extensible, supporting dynamic configuration, advanced traffic routing, and built-in observability. Envoy can serve as an ingress controller, offering granular control over traffic entering your Kubernetes cluster.
Key Features:
Support for advanced Layer 7 features like retries, circuit breaking, and rate limiting.
Integrated observability with distributed tracing and metrics collection.
Extensible architecture with support for custom filters and plugins.
Use Case: Envoy is an excellent choice for teams looking for a feature-rich ingress controller that can handle complex traffic management scenarios and integrate deeply with cloud-native environments.
Minus Points:
6. Istio Ingress Gateway
Istio is a comprehensive service mesh that includes an ingress gateway component. The Istio Ingress Gateway is built on Envoy and provides advanced traffic management features, including intelligent routing, security, and observability. It’s particularly useful for organizations that are already using Istio for service mesh purposes.
Key Features:
Advanced traffic management with support for intelligent routing, fault injection, and traffic shifting.
Strong security features, including mTLS, authorization policies, and fine-grained access control.
Integrated observability with support for metrics, logging, and tracing.
Use Case: Istio Ingress Gateway is ideal for organizations already using or planning to adopt Istio as a service mesh. It offers seamless integration with the broader Istio ecosystem, providing a unified solution for service management and ingress control.
Minus Points:
It requires an Istio service mesh, which adds complexity and overhead.
Overkill for simple use cases.
7. Contour
Contour is an ingress controller based on Envoy, designed to provide advanced traffic routing for Kubernetes clusters. It’s known for its high performance, scalability, and support for modern HTTP/2 and gRPC protocols, making it a great choice for microservices architectures.
Key Features:
High performance with support for HTTP/2 and gRPC.
Easy deployment with Kubernetes Custom Resource Definitions (CRDs) for configuration.
Native support for advanced routing features, including path-based routing, header manipulation, and more.
Use Case: Contour is well-suited for organizations that require a lightweight, high-performance ingress controller with support for modern protocols like HTTP/2 and gRPC.
Minus Points:
Conclusion on Best Ingress Controllers for Kubernetes
Selecting the right ingress controller for the Kubernetes environment depends on your specific needs. For environments requiring stability and community support, NGINX is a solid choice. If dynamic service discovery and SSL management are priorities, Traefik is a strong contender. HAProxy Ingress is ideal for high-performance traffic management, while Envoy offers advanced traffic routing and observability features.
However, if security is your top priority, particularly in the context of a zero-trust architecture, Pomerium stands out as the best choice. Its ability to enforce identity-based access control, integrate seamlessly with existing identity providers, and provide a secure, centralized access management solution makes it an excellent ingress controller for modern Kubernetes environments.
